* server : add SWA checkpoints
ggml-ci
* cont : server clean-up
* server : handle state restore fails
* llama : add extended llama_state_seq_ API
* server : do not make checkpoints if --swa-full
ggml-ci
* llama : remove flags value for NONE
* server : configure number of SWA checkpoints with CLI arg
ggml-ci
* args : fix scope of new argument
* examples/finetune -opt SGD (stochastic gradient descent) memory opt
add unit tested GGML_OPT_OPTIMIZER_SGD to ggml - avoids allocating
m, v tensors.
support finetune.cpp arg -opt SGD (or sgd). (default adamw as before)
llama 3.2-1b-F32 result: observed 11gb gpu ram (41 sec/epoch)
when using SGD instead of 19gb (55 sec/epoch) using adamw.
(wikipedia 100 lines finetune)
(
using the same GPU memory, adamw can only do before OOM 512
batch/context, reaching:
train: [███████▉] data=0000140/0000140 loss=0.02575±0.00099 acc=99.52±0.03% t=00:00:47 ETA=00:00:00
val: [███████▉] data=0000008/0000008 loss=4.76565±0.28810 acc=41.46±0.77% t=00:00:00 ETA=00:00:00
SGD is superior, though it converges slower, with max before OOM 1728
batch/context (esp see the better validation perf):
train: [███████▉] data=0000039/0000039 loss=0.00371±0.00010 acc=99.96±0.01% t=00:00:41 ETA=00:00:00
val: [███████▉] data=0000003/0000003 loss=5.11406±0.76034 acc=48.01±0.69% t=00:00:01 ETA=00:00:00
)
note: when finetuning long enough (or w/ enough -lr),
validation accuracy *eventually* drops ('catastrophic forgetting')
-lr-half (halflife) option useful for SGD to avoid oscillation or
super slow underdamped learning (makes setting -lr more forgiving).
terminal -lr for now is set by lr-halvings i.e. if you want at most
1/8 the inital -lr you set -lr-halvings 3.
note: objective loss not directly comparable between adamw, sgd? -
check perplexity or accuracy or consider relative improvements
for convergence
new finetune args -wd 1e-9 to enable weight decay in sgd or adamw,
and max -epochs N (default 2 as before)
cache (1 - wd*alpha) in 'adamw' opt struct -
no noticeable perf benefit, disabled (still done
for new SGD though)
since opt. memory is pre-allocated, the ggml_opt_get_optimizer_params
would probably be able to change between SGD and AdamW with each epoch
but would need to use adamw for the first (unconfirmed - no cmdline arg
to set such a policy yet)
test-opt checks adamw as before and now sgd (except for a few disabled
tests for sgd only; probably just needs logging values and adding
alternate reference values); tolerance on the 'regression'
test is broader for sgd (so we don't need many more epochs)
* Vulkan: Implement GGML_OP_OPT_STEP_SGD
* tests: Fix OPT_STEP_SGD test-backend-ops
* SGD op param store weight-decay and not 1-alpha*wd
* minor + cosmetic changes
* fix vulkan sgd
* try CI fix
---------
Co-authored-by: 0cc4m <picard12@live.de>
Co-authored-by: Johannes Gäßler <johannesg@5d6.de>
* kv-cache : simplify the "struct llama_kv_cache" interface
ggml-ci
* kv-cache : revert the (n_swa + n_ubatch) change (for next PR)
ggml-ci
* kv-cache : some comments
ggml-ci
* context : fix graph reserve for multiple sequences
ggml-ci
* kv-cache : fix typo [no ci]
* kv-cache : fix find_slot() logic for free slots
ggml-ci
* llama : add TODO for deprecating the defrag API in the future
* kv-cache : improve find_slot() using min/max seq pos info
ggml-ci
* llama : handle aborts and compute errors
ggml-ci
* memory : extract state into llama_memory_state
ggml-ci
* kv-cache : add comments
ggml-ci
* server : update batching logic to reset n_batch on successful decode
* server : upon full re-processing, remove the sequence from the cache
* kv-cache : add TODO for doing split_equal when split_simple fails
ggml-ci
* llama/ggml: add LLM training support
more compact progress bar
llama_save_model_to_file
llama_opt_param_filter
ggml_graph_dup force_grads
refactor ggml_opt, fix test-opt
* remove logits_all
* refactor CUDA implementation for ACC
* reset graph at beginning of opt period
* llama : introduce llama_set_warmup() API call that controls warmup mode; use all MoE experts during warmup
* common : use new API to enable warmup mode during model warmup
---------
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
